Publisher’s responsibilities
Objectivity. The editor evaluates manuscripts without regard to the gender, age, race, sexual orientation, religious views, ancestry, citizenship, political preferences of the authors, or personal relationships with them.

Confidentiality. The editor does not disclose information about the author and reviewer during and after the review process to persons outside the editorial board.

Conflict of Interest. In case of a conflict of interest that prevents an objective evaluation of the manuscript, the responsible editor is obliged to notify the Editor-in-Chief and/or Deputy Editor-in-Chief as soon as possible and transfer the evaluation of the manuscript to any of these persons.

Responsibilities of reviewers

Objectivity. The reviewer must provide an objective and reasoned evaluation of the submitted manuscript.

Confidentiality. The reviewer does not disclose information about the article submitted for review.

Absence of conflict of interest. In case of a conflict of interest that prevents an objective evaluation of the manuscript, the reviewer is obliged to notify the responsible editor about it as soon as possible and refuse to review the manuscript.
Responsibilities of authors
Originality. The author submits to the editorial office a fully original work containing only correct citations of scientific and other literature and references to the materials. Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable and leads to unconditional rejection of the article.

Observance of copyright. By submitting material to the editorial office, the author or team of authors confirms that the material is the object of copyright of the author/authors themselves. Transfer of third-party copyrights (e.g., for illustrative material) is confirmed by a documented written consent of the copyright holders to the use of these materials.

Uniqueness. The author does not submit to the editorial office material that has been published in another publication earlier or is under consideration in another publication. Transfer of the material under consideration to another edition is possible only with the agreement of the responsible editor and entails rejection of publication in the journal “Folklore and Anthropology of the City”. The question of publishing translated works previously published in another language is solved individually in coordination with the edition-right holder.

Observance of scientific ethics. By submitting the material to the editorial board, the author confirms that all results are as reliable as possible, the research methodology is reproducible, and the data were obtained in compliance with research ethics. In order to respect confidentiality, the journal recommends that authors do not disclose personal data of informants unless the informant's desire to publish his/her personal data is recorded in writing.

Corrections. If after the publication of the material significant errors are revealed, the editorial office together with the author may decide to publish corrections (in the print version - in the next issue of the journal, in the web version the corrections are added to the text).

Procedures for resolving conflicts.

1. If there is a conflict between any participants of the editorial process (author, reviewer, responsible editor, scientific editor), the party that recorded the conflict is obliged to notify the Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor-in-Chief and Editor-in-Chief by e-mail.

2. The mentioned persons collegially evaluate the situation and make a decision on the conflict resolution within a period of no more than 5 working days from the moment of the complaint receipt.

3. The parties to the conflict are notified of the decision by e-mail.

Retraction Policy

Retraction. The order of retraction of articles is subject to the rules for withdrawal of articles from publication, developed by the Ethics Council of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers (ASEP)