Preview

Urban Folklore and Anthropology

Advanced search

At the intersection of social science and visuality: Documentary film as a method of research on homelessness in the urban environment

EDN: IORWHP

Abstract

This article presents a methodological reflection on the use of documentary film as a standalone method of visual sociological research. Using the example of the film On the Way Home, created by the authors in collaboration with the charitable organization Nochlezhka, the articl e explores the possibilities and limitations of employing a video camera as a research tool in the field. The camera is not merely a tool for recording empirical material, but also serves as a mediator that shapes fieldwork dynamics and influences the interpretation of data. In this context, documentary film is regarded not as a means of illustrating research results, but as a fully-fledged method of sociological inquiry that can offer a more nuanced understanding of social processes. The article further engages with questions of visual representation of marginality in the urban environment, the analysis of visual language, ethical dilemmas, and working with vulnerable research participants. The authors argue that the strengths of documentary film lie in its capacity to convey context, emotion, interactional dynamics, and multiple perspectives — dimensions often lost in conventional textbased sociological methods. Filming enables the documentation of complex social phenomena while also acting as a catalyst for reflection — on the part of researchers, participants, and viewers alike. At the same time, this method entails certain limitations, including the potential distortion of observed reality, the fragmentation of empirical material, and the risk of oversimplifying complex realities through narrative reduction. 

About the Authors

E. V. Eliseeva
Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Elizaveta Vyacheslavovna Eliseeva

Saint Petersburg



A. D. Petrova
Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Alina Dmitrievna Petrova

Saint Petersburg



K. I. Ryzhukhina
Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Kristina Ilinichina Ryzhukhina

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Borish, D., Cunsolo, A., Mauro, I., Dewey, C., Harper, S., Harper, S. (2021). Moving images, Moving Methods: Advancing Documentary Film for Qualitative Research. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, Article 160940692110136. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013646

2. Denzin, N. K. (2004). Reading film: using films and videos as empirical social science material. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke (Eds.). A companion to qualitative research, 237–242. London: SAGE.

3. Fitzgerald, A., Lowe, M. (2020). Acknowledging documentary filmmaking as not only an output but a research process: A case for quality research practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(2020), Article 1609406920957462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920957462

4. Franceschelli, M., Galipò, A. (2021). The use of film documentary in social science research: Audio-visual accounts of the ‘migration crisis’ from the Italian island of Lampedusa. Visual Studies, 36(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/147258 6X.2020.1769497

5. Grady, J. (1996). The scope of visual sociology. Visual Sociology, 11(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869608583762

6. Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. The American Sociologist, 19(1), 54–70.

7. Kaiser, A. (2016). Do documentary films constitute social science? Political Analysis, 18(1), 6.

8. Kovalenko, E. A., Strokova, E. L. (2013). Homelessness: Is there a way out? Moscow: Fond “Institut jekonomiki goroda”. (In Russian).

9. Kuziner, E. (2024). Homelessness: Methodology, Emotional Involvement and the Researcher’s Role in Sensitive Field. Inter, 16(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.4 (In Russian).

10. Kuziner, E. N. (2020). “I’m going home, home means the basement”: Everyday practices and survival strategies of homeless women. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, 2020(4), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.4.1653

11. Kuziner, E. N. (2023). “People don’t live there, on the streets — they are surviving”: Gender specifics of homelessness coping strategies in St. Petersburg, Russia. Social Sciences, 12(9), Article 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090476

12. Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology: An introduction. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

13. Omel’chenko, D. A., Polyakov, S. I. (2017). Researcher with a camera in the space of media publicity: Field experience. Interakciya. Interv’yu. Interpretaciya, 9(13), 73–81. (In Russian).

14. Vannini, P. (2018). Doing public ethnography: How to create and disseminate ethnographic and qualitative research to wide audiences. London; New York: Routledge.


Review

For citations:


Eliseeva E.V., Petrova A.D., Ryzhukhina K.I. At the intersection of social science and visuality: Documentary film as a method of research on homelessness in the urban environment. Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2025;7(3):58-73. (In Russ.) EDN: IORWHP

Views: 1


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-3895 (Print)