(Non)dangerous heritage: How the themes of city tours reflect processes of cultural appropriation (a case study of the Kaliningrad region)
EDN: EBFHFO
Abstract
The article examines the processes of cultural appropriation — the adoption of artifacts, forms of cultural expression, and other elements of a foreign culture, as well as various modes of adapting heritage and integrating it into everyday life. Using the example of the Kaliningrad region, it is shown how complex relations with German cultural heritage influence both the work of urban activists engaged in preserving and restoring historical sites and the organization of city tours. The authors come to the conclusion that, despite the region’s high tourism potential, there are many competing ways of perceiving German heritage. City tours, to some extent, facilitate the appropriation of cultural heritage. In particular, one can observe not only a focus by tour agencies and private guides on medieval history and narratives of military glory, but also the emergence of various leisure formats in which city facades become attractive backdrops without direct references to historical events. Such adaptations may lead to a fragmented or distorted understanding of the region’s history, avoiding both idealization and demonization yet lacking a holistic perspective. Recently, more niche excursion routes and stories that reveal the history of the region in all the diversity of its cultural and historical layers have become popular. This model of appropriation is directly related to the practices of caring for monuments, their preservation by activists and their presentation as aesthetically appealing and socially engaging objects. The tourism product reflects shifting tastes, changing notions of authenticity and its display, and more broadly the overall strategy of appropriation.
About the Authors
A. V. StrelnikovaRussian Federation
Annа V. Strelnikova
Moscow
S. D. Kalinycheva
Russian Federation
SofIа D. Kalinycheva
Moscow
References
1. Alexander, J. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser, P. Sztompka (Eds.). Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Alimpieva, A. V. (2014). Social identity in conditions of cultural diversity: search or imposition? (the case of Kaliningrad Oblast). Bulletin of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Philology, pedagogy, psychology, 2024(11), 60–66. (In Russian).
3. Assman, A. (2014). The long shadow of the past: memorial culture and historical politics. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).
4. Bauman, Z. (2018). Retrotopia. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2018(6), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.22 (In Russian).
5. Belintseva, I. V. (2023). Architecture of East Prussia. Kaliningrad: Zhivem. (In Russian).
6. Berger, S. (2012). A city and its pasts: Popular histories in Kaliningrad between regionalization and nationalization. In S. Berger, C. Lorenz, B. Melman (Eds.). Popularizing national pasts: 1800 to the present, 288–307. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203182284
7. Certeau, M. de (2010). Ghosts in the city. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2010(70/2), 108– 121. (In Russian).
8. Dement’ev, I. O. (2012). “A rowan by the loophole”: rehabilitation of the prewar past in the memory of Kaliningrad residents (1970s–1980s). Acta Historica Universitatis Klaipedensis, 24(2012), 92–118. (In Russian).
9. Dement’ev, I. O. (2014). “What can I know?”: formation of discourses about the past of Kaliningrad Oblast in the Soviet period (late 1940s–1980s). LiT. Istoricheskii almanakh, 2014(6), 175–218. (In Russian).
10. Eco, U. (1994). The Middle Ages have already begun. Inostrannaia literatura, 1994(4), 258–267. (In Russian).
11. Halicka, B. (2020). The Polish wild west: Forced migration and cultural appropriation in the Polish-German borderlands, 1945–1948. London, New York: Routledge.
12. Hirsch, M. (2008). The generation of postmemory: Writing and visual culture after the Holocaust. Poetics Today, 29(1), 103–128.
13. Huck, C., Bauernschmidt, S. (2012). Trans-cultural appropriation. In C. Huck, S. Bauernschmidt (Eds.). Travelling goods, travelling moods. Varieties of cultural appropriation (1850–1950), 229–251. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.
14. Kalinycheva, S. D. (2024). The critical turn in heritage studies: from authoritative discourse to grassroots practices. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 16(4), 10– 24. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.4.1 (In Russian).
15. Kalinycheva, S. D. (2025). Cultural appropriation of the German heritage of Kaliningrad Oblast: models and practices. Master’s thesis (manuscript). Moscow: HSE University. (In Russian).
16. Kostiashov, Yu. V., Mattes, E. (2003). The expulsion of the Prussian spirit. Forbidden memory. Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. (In Russian).
17. Lowenthal, D. (2004). The past is a foreign country. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dahl. (In Russian).
18. Lübbe, G. (2019). Keeping pace with time. The shortened stay in the present. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian).
19. Lutz, H. (1990). Cultural appropriation as a process of displacing peoples and history. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 10(2), 167–182.
20. Narvselius, E. (2018). Demonized, domesticated, virtualized: Fortification buildings as a case of Prussian heritage in present-day Kaliningrad. Nationalities Papers, 46(3), 400–421.
21. Radchenko, D. A. (2021). With a view to the European Union: borderland practices in Sovetsk. Urban Folklore & Anthropology, IV(1–2), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658 (In Russian).
22. Radchenko, D. A. (2023). Objects on the boundary of memory territories: between Tilsit and Sovetsk. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2023(6), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541523060039 (In Russian).
23. Riegl, A. (2018). The modern cult of monuments: its essence and origins. Moscow: TsEM, V-A-C press. (In Russian).
24. Rogers, R. A. (2006). From cultural exchange to transculturation: A review and reconceptualization of cultural appropriation. Communication Theory, 16(4), 474–503.
25. Sezneva, O. (2002). Living in the Russian present with a German past: The problems of identity in the city of Kaliningrad. In D. Crowley, S. Reid (Eds.). Socialist Spaces in Eastern and Central Europe, 47–64. London: Berg Publishers.
26. Sezneva, O. (2013). Architecture of descent: Historical reconstructions and the politics of belonging in Kaliningrad, the former Königsberg. Journal of Urban History, 39(4), 767–787.
27. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
28. Vengesayi, S., Mavondo, F., Reisinger, Y. (2009). Tourism destination attractiveness: Attractions, facilities, and people as predictors. Tourism Analysis, 14(5), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354209X12597959359211
Review
For citations:
Strelnikova A.V., Kalinycheva S.D. (Non)dangerous heritage: How the themes of city tours reflect processes of cultural appropriation (a case study of the Kaliningrad region). Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2025;7(4):18-44. (In Russ.) EDN: EBFHFO



















