Preview

Urban Folklore and Anthropology

Advanced search

Kintsugi of the urban environment: Development at the intersection of commerce, science, and society

EDN: VBKEFU

Abstract

This article presents a critical review of the youth scientific conference “Metropolises III: Development and the New Urban Crisis,” organized by the Center for Urban Studies at Tyumen State University. The authors aim to uncover hidden yet significant “fault lines” in the contemporary understanding of development — not as a merely commercial real-estate activity, but as a complex, multidimensional process of urban space production. Central to the discussion is the figure of the developer, whose role extends beyond that of a traditional builder to include functions such as curator of cultural memory, research partner, marketer, and sometimes even facilitator. Drawing on an analysis of the conference presentations, the article identifies several key thematic directions: developers’ engagement with academia and universities; their use of placemaking tools — including commemorative practices and naming strategies — to create meaningful places and counteract placelessness; interactions with urban communities through both conflicts and participatory practices; and the emergence of “alternative” forms of development — Soviet-era, university-led, and informal. The review underscores the need to broaden the conceptual toolkit of urban studies by integrating alternative models of spatial production and demonstrates that development is not only an economic process but also a semiotic, political, and cultural one.

About the Authors

K. S. Rasskazova
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Kristina S. Rasskazova 

Tyumen



A. V. Kerdivar
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Andrei V. Kerdivar 

Tyumen



References

1. Abers, R. N. (2000). Inventing local democracy: Grassroots politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371378

2. Banham, R. (1996). A black box: The secret profession of architecture. In M. Banham, P. Barker, S. Bayley, C. Price (Eds.). A critic writes: Selected essays by Reyner Banham, 292–299. Berkeley: University of California Press.

3. Boanada-Fuchs, A., Boanada, V. (2022). The role of real estate developers in urban development. Geoforum, 134(2022), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.009

4. Davis, M. (1990). City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London, New York: Verso Books.

5. Florida, R. (2018). The new urban crisis: How our cities are increasing inequality, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class — and what we can do about it. New York: Little Brown.

6. García-Lamarca, M., Anguelovski, I., Cole, H. V. S., Connolly, J. J. T., Pérez-delPulgar, C., Shokry, G., Triguero-Mas, M. (2022). Urban green grabbing: Residential real estate developers’ discourse and practice in gentrifying Global North neighborhoods. Geoforum, 128(2022), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.016

7. Kavouras, I., Sardis, E., Protopapadakis, E., Rallis, I., Doulamis, A., Doulamis, N. (2023). A low-cost gamified urban planning methodology enhanced with cocreation and participatory approaches. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032297.

8. Kayanan, C. M. (2021). A critique of innovation districts: Entrepreneurial living and the burden of shouldering urban development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211043002.

9. Malinowski, B. (1998). Magic, science and religion. Moscow: Refl-book. (In Russian).

10. Mauss, M. (2000). Outline of a general theory of magic. In M. Moss. Social functions of the sacred, 107–229. St. Petersburg: Evraziia. (In Russian).

11. Murawski, M. (2017). Introduction: Crystallising the social condenser. The Journal of Architecture, 22(3), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1309123

12. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

13. Robinson, J., Wu, F., Harrison, P., Wang, Z., Todes, A., Dittgen, R., Attuyer, K. (2022). Beyond variegation: The territorialisation of states, communities and developers in large-scale developments in Johannesburg, Shanghai and London. Urban Studies, 59(8), 1715–1740. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211064159

14. Snow, D. A., Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1988), 197–217.

15. Soja, E. W. (2001). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.


Review

For citations:


Rasskazova K.S., Kerdivar A.V. Kintsugi of the urban environment: Development at the intersection of commerce, science, and society. Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2025;7(4):214-228. (In Russ.) EDN: VBKEFU

Views: 29


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-3895 (Print)