On the new dictionary of toponymic periphrases. A review of: Morozov, M., Iakimenko, N. (2022). A dictionary of toponymic periphrases: Names of Russian cities and towns (on the material of contemporary publicism). St. Petersburg: Aleteiia. (In Russian)

1. Alekseevskii, M., Zherdeva, A., Lurie, M., Senkina, A. (2008). A dictionary of local text as a method of describing urban cultural tradition (on the material of Mogilev-Podolsky). In V. A. Dymshits, A. L. L’vov, A. V. Sokolova (Eds.). Shtetl, 21th century: Field studies, 186–215. St. Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russian).

2. Akhmetova, M. (2012). Cities and towns as relatives (on one type of metaphorical use of terms of kinship in Russian language). In V. Popov (Ed.). Algebra of kinship. Kinship. Systems of terms of kinship, 13, 111–147. St. Peterburg: Muzej antropologii i etnografii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. (In Russian).

3. Gasparov, M. (2001). Periphrasis. In A. Nikoliukin (Ed.). Literary encyclopedia of terms and notions. Moscow: Intelvak. (In Russian).

4. Grishchenko, A. (2012). On the contemporary history of the Russian word rossiyane. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, 2012(1), 119–139. (In Russian).

5. Gukova, L., Fomina, L. (2006). Toponymic periphrasis: An introduction to the problem. Logos onomastike, 2006(1), 72–80. (In Russian).

6. Ilyin, D. (2010). Onomastic secondary nomination in the language of the regional press. Scientific notes of Orel State University. Ser. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2010(3, Pt. 2), 140–145. (In Russian).

7. Isaeva, E. (2014). Use of paraphrase for designating Quebec geographical objects. Kanadskii ezhegodnik, 18, 110–121. (In Russian).

8. Klubkova, T. (2001). Periphrases of cities and towns and local text. In A. Belousov, M. Stroganov (Eds.). Province as reality and object of reflection, 26–29. Tver: Tverskoi gosudarstvennyi universitet. (In Russian).

9. Miliugina, E. (2014). ‘Capitalness’ of province. In E. Miliugina, M. Stroganov (Eds.). Text of space: Materials for a dictionary, 299–304. Tver: SFK-ofis. (In Russian).

10. Pavlova, A. (2012). Can we judge a nation’s culture on the basis of its language. Forum for Anthropology and Culture, 16 Online, 3–60. URL: https://anthropologie.kunstkamera.ru/files/pdf/016online/pavlova3.pdf. (In Russian).

11. Peredreeva, T. (2018). National and cultural specificy of the German toponymic periphrases. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Ser. Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2018(2), 84–87. (In Russian).

12. Rozhkov, K. (2016). Branding of Russian territories: An opinion of a marketing specialist on the role of symbolic of place. In M. Akhmetova, M. Baiduzh, N. Petrov (Eds.). Branding of territories: Between marketing and folklore: Materials of International Conference (Moscow, December 2–3, 2016), 69–71. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).

13. Stroganov, M. (2014). A corner of Moscow. In E. Miliugina, M. Stroganov (Eds.). Text of space: Materials for a dictionary, 145–148. Tver: SFK-ofis. (In Russian).