Preview

Urban Folklore and Anthropology

Advanced search

The enthnography of Russian streaming

https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-127-146

Abstract

This paper focuses on teamwork during video game streams on the Twitch service. Using Urry’s “affective community” term, the authors try to describe how the streamer and its audience build emotional bonds, strengthening community boundaries or conflicting on some issues. Having conducted a series of interviews with streamers, as well as several observations, we derive a number of categories defining the structure of communication between the streamer and its viewers. Metaphorically, we call this structure “salon”, where the streamer is not always a central figure, but rather a moderator. Streaming is interpreted as an online form of offline mass gathering, the specifics of which is more about the horizontal structure of the community — as opposed to YouTube or Instagram* practices where the blogger takes the center stage, and the community is based on an opposition between the blogger and their audience. The article demonstrates the stability of streaming communities. Due to their all-permeating structure (messengers, social networks, message boards, etc.), on the one hand, and due to emotional bond generated via experiencing affectus of involvement, on the other hand, such communities are platform-independent associations of people who are capable of migration between platform, of economic and emotional solidarity, and of stability against prolonged hiatuses in nominal activity of the community-building streamer.

About the Authors

Irina V. Ksenofontova
Independent researcher; Club for internet and society enthusiasts
Russian Federation

Irina V. Ksenofontova, 

Moscow.



Alexander A. Suslov
HSE Art and Design School; Club for internet and society enthusiasts
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Suslov,

Moscow.



References

1. Burgess, J., Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Medford, PA: Polity Press.

2. Ford, C., Gardner, D., Horgan, L. E., Liu, C., Tsaasan, A. M., Nardi, B., Rickman, J. (2017). Chat speed op pogchamp: Practices of coherence in massive Twitch chat. In G. Mark, S. Fussell (Eds.). CHI EA‘17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. May 2017, 858–871. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

3. Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.

4. Hamilton, W.A., Garretson, O., Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. In M. Jones, P. Palanque (Eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1315–1324. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

5. Lee, C. S. (2019). Web series, YouTube, and politics: Affective and emotional dimensions of WIGS Lauren’s user comments. Social Media + Society, 5(1). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2056305118820766

6. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.

7. Taylor, T. L. (2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

8. Urry, G. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.

9. Yang, X., Gao, S. (2017). Understanding the values of live game streaming: A value-focused thinking approach. WHICEB 2017 proceedings. 21. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2017/21/


Review

For citations:


Ksenofontova I.V., Suslov A.A. The enthnography of Russian streaming. Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2023;5(1):127-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-127-146

Views: 115


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-3895 (Print)