Orbituary as an institutional statement
https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2025-7-1-14-36
Abstract
For a modern individual, identifying and classifying oneself and others through the professional community to which one belongs is highly relevant. In modern obituaries, the working life, public service, and professional qualities of the deceased often overshadow their individual personality traits. As a result, references to profession, involvement in specific organizations, and a list of professional achievements have become distinctive and even integral features of modern obituaries. The procedure for publishing an obituary in a newspaper reflects social hierarchy and denotes the social status of the deceased during their lifetime. The author of an obituary is often presented as a collective voice — representatives of a specific organization. Furthermore, the involvement of the deceased in particular institutions and professional fields is frequently evident in the design of tombstones in modern urban cemeteries. The earthly successes of the deceased are often recorded in the space of the dead, thus immortalizing their achievements. Institutions, therefore, dictate a particular procedure for integrating the deceased into the space of public memory. This article will focus on the ways in which the professional affiliations of the deceased are articulated and their working achievements externalized through an institutionalized set of expressive means and clichés. It will also examine the choice of specific life scenarios used to describe the life of the deceased. The conclusions presented in the article are based on data from a study of obituaries (2000–2015) published in the Tsarskoselskaya Gazeta, the leading print media outlet in the town of Pushkin (a locality within the Pushkinsky District of St. Petersburg), as well as an analysis of early 21st-century tombstones at Kuzminskoye Cemetery, one of the main burial grounds in the town.
About the Author
K. A. OnipkoRussian Federation
Kira A. Onipko
St. Petersburg
References
1. Berger, P., Luckmann, T. (1995). The social construction of reality: A Treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Medium. (In Russian).
2. Brooks, J. (1991). Revolutionary lives: Public identities in Pravda during the 1920s. In S. White (Ed.). New Directions in Soviet History, 27–40. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press.
3. Douglas, M. (2020). How institutions think. Moscow: Elementarnye formy. (In Russian).
4. Matich, O. (2021). Museums of death: Paris and Moscow cemeteries. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russian).
5. Onipko, K. A. (2016). The existence of the obituary in the social order of a small town. Archaeology of Russian death, 2016(2), 155–174. (In Russian).
6. Onipko, K. A. (2018). Pragmatics of Obituary. Author’s Position. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. History. Philology. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies, 2018(9), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6355-2018-9-50-60 (In Russian).
7. Onipko, K. A. (2018). The town, the townsman, and the townswoman in the obituaries of the local press. In N. L. Pushkareva, N. A. Gronskaia, N. K. Radina (Eds.). City dwellers and city men in political, economic, and cultural processes of Russian urbanization in the 14th–21st centuries. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Scientific Conference of the RARWH and the IEA RAS, October 4–7, 2018, Nizhny Novgorod, in 2 volumes, 1, 314–315. Moscow: Institut jetnologii i antropologii Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. (In Russian).
8. Orlova, G. A. (2009). (Close to) Death biography: Notes on the Soviet political obituary. Neprikosnovenny zapas, 2009(2). Retrieved from https://magazines. gorky.media/nz/2009/2/biografiya-pri-smerti-zametki-o-sovetskom-politicheskom-nekrologe.html (In Russian).
9. Safronov, E. V. (2009). Actualization in funeral rites (Based on of the Ulyanovsk region material). RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies, 2009(9), 159–168. (In Russian).
10. Sherstobitov, K. A. (2015). “Additional information” on the monuments: Analysis of decoration of the material and architectural sign space by the case of the city cemeteries of Kimry and Dubna. Archaeology of Russian Death, 2015(1), 169–192. (In Russian).
11. Veselova, I. S. Narratology of stereotypical authentic prose. Retrieved from https:// folk.ru/Research/veselova_narratolog.php (In Russian).
12. Walter, T. (1996). A New Model of Grief: Bereavement and Biography. Mortality, 1(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/713685822
Review
For citations:
Onipko K.A. Orbituary as an institutional statement. Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2025;7(1):14-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2025-7-1-14-36