Bas-relief as a tactic of urban space appropriation
EDN: EELUSQ
Abstract
Article analyzes “bas-reliefing” as an emerging practice within contemporary street art. The empirical basis of the study consists of materials collected between 2023 and 2025, including 10 in-depth interviews with street artists, interviews with curators and city residents, participant observation at art events, and a visual archive of 300 photographs of bas-reliefs.
The aim of the study is to identify the motivations behind artists’ turn to bas-reliefs and to analyze their interactions with urban space and audiences. The study examines the differences between prepared and unprepared audiences, the spatial logic guiding the placement of bas-reliefs, and the performative component of communication between street artists and city residents.
The author conceptualizes bas-reliefs as a form of street art that allows artists to maintain a dialogue with the city, circumvent institutional and censorship restrictions, and develop new ways of appropriating and understanding the urban environment.
The author concludes that bas-reliefs act as a tactical form of exercising the “right to the city”, allowing artists to maintain a presence in public space without directly confronting institutional strategies of control. The distinction between trained and untrained audiences reveals a multiplicity of modes of interpreting bas-reliefs: from their perception as vandalism to emotional appropriation and inclusion in personal memory practices. The performative nature of bas-reliefs dictates specific scenarios of interaction with city residents: accidental discovery, tactile contact, and the possibility of appropriation. Overall, bas-reliefs can be viewed as an emergent form of street art that adapts to normative pressures through their small scale, physicality, and tactical invisibility.
About the Author
Anastasia M. MorozovaRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Agramakova, O. I., Artsybasheva, T. N. (2014). Street Art in the Context of Interaction with Urban Space. In T. N. Artsybasheva, G. A. Saltyk (Eds.). World of Culture: Cultural Studies, Culturography, Culturology, 60–64. Kursk: Kursk State University. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/UHICBB
2. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3. de Certeau, M. (2013). The Practice of Everyday Life. St. Petersburg.: Publishing House of the European University at St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
4. Ferrell, J., Weide, D. R. (2010). Spot theory. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 14(1–2), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810903525157
5. Iveson, K. (2009). War is over (if you want it): Rethinking the graffiti problem. Australian Planner, 46(4), 24–34.
6. Kartseva, E. (2022). Terminological approaches and criteria of public art from the standpoint of cultural dialogue. In I. V. Pulikova (Ed.). Public art vs city: dialogue or confrontation? The collection of articles, 16–26. Moscow: The State Institute for Art Studies. (In Russian).
7. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on сities. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Lefebvre, H. (2015). The Production of Space. Мoscow: Strelka Press. (In Russian).
9. Samutina, N., Zaporozhets, O. (2024). The more they paint over, the more they inspire: small street inscriptions and the struggle for communication in Moscow’s public space. In O. Zaporozhets, B.
10. Stepanov, K. Levinson (Eds.). HistoriCity: Urban research and history of modernity. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 175–186. (In Russian).
11. Samutina, N., Zaporozhets, O., Kobyshcha, V. (2012). Not Only Banksy: Street Art in the Context of Contemporary Urban Culture. Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, (6), 221–244. (In Russian).
12. Simmel, G. (2002). The Metropolis and Mental Life. Logos, 3(34), 1–12. (In Russian). Stevens, Q. (2007). The Ludic City: Exploring the potential of public spaces. New York:
13. Routledge.
14. Waclawek, A. (2011). Graffiti and Street Art. London: Thames & Hudson.
15. Zhelnina, A. (2014). “Party”, creativity and the right to the city: urban public space in Russia before and after the protest wave of 2011–2012. Stasis, 2(1), 260–295. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/NZWEVV
16.
Review
For citations:
Morozova A.M. Bas-relief as a tactic of urban space appropriation. Urban Folklore and Anthropology. 2026;8(1):128-155. (In Russ.) EDN: EELUSQ
JATS XML


















